I Checked Barbara's Text...

First of all, both debates presented their thesis very clear to S/P *audiences. However, the first group was SM* most dynamic SM* because there was an interaction between people who were SM* disagreement that any professional can be a teacher and people who were in favor of this. These two teams showed a lot of important arguments trying to convince SM* audience which group was right. But, I think that it was lack of information about ( )*some S/P*argument that some people said, this is one of the things that have to be improved. I ( )*really think that the group which won was WW* people who were against professionals can WW*be a teacher in schools. WW*Because of, I am convinced that a teacher has to respect his or her carrier as well as doctors or lawyers do ( )*it.Unfortunately, the second group, which topic was voluntary votes, made a mistake because there WW*do not exist any team which were against this topic. For that reason, S/P*audiences had to participate in order to create a real debate; this situation was very interesting and entertaining because all of us had the opportunity to express our thoughts about it. Nevertheless, there were some people who did not had good manage of the topic, so I think that some of them needed to prepare much better their arguments in order to convince to ( )* audience that their were right finding more information about this topic. In this case, I think that any group won because it did not have enough information to support ideas.